Although the self-assembly of MnClTPP has been previously studied by Beggan et al. , the following high-resolution images reveal some new behaviour not reported by Beggan and colleagues.
When deposited onto the Ag(111) surface, the MnClTPP molecules self-assemble into close-packed structures (Figure 5.4). Although at low coverages the Ag step edges are decorated, the majority of the growth occurs in the middle of terraces, forming large, often rectangular islands, with a square packing geometry and two equal lattice parameters of 1.41 ▒ 0.05 nm.
The supramolecular ordering of a deposited porphyrin overlayer has been shown to be mostly triggered by the molecule’s side groups; indeed a similar packing scheme, with the same geometry has previously been reported for tetraphenyl-porphyrins (TPPs) with different metal centres on noble surfaces: Co- and Fe-TPP on Ag(111) [196, 197]; and Ni-, Cu- and Co-TPP on Au(111) , and the current data agree with those reported by Beggan et al .
LEED taken from 1 ML of MnClTPP on the Ag(111) surface, published by Beggan et al, shows a series of 12 spots arranged in a circle . A similar LEED pattern was observed for our system (not shown). These 12 spots are formed by 3 equivalent squares each rotated by 30░, corresponding to the three simple-cubic domains of the MnClTPP monolayer.
One side of each square lies parallel to one of the close-packed directions of the Ag(111) reciprocal unit cell, indicating that although the monolayer growth does not begin at the step edges, in contrast to the case of NiDPP, the substrate still plays a role in the self-assembly. Again, a similar arrangement has been observed for other TPPs on Ag(111), with the substrate imparting a direction to the overlayer primitive unit cell, and also one of the molecular axes lying parallel to a close-packed Ag(111) direction [196, 197].
Although LEED indicates that three rotational domains coexist on the surface, figure 5.4c shows the boundary between two domains in the MnClTPP monolayer, with the same orientation of unit cells. It is evident that the two domains are nevertheless different from one another in that they cannot be transformed from one to the other by simple rotation or translation, only by a mirror operation, i.e. they are chiral enantiomers of one another.
It has previously been shown that achiral molecules deposited on an achiral surface can give rise to chirality in the adsorbed layer [78, 216–218]. Indeed, Buchner et al. have recently described the local organisational chirality of TPP monolayers in some detail, and a similar treatment is applicable here .
It is noted that in this study of MnClTPP, as in Buchner’s work, the only domain boundaries observed within the closed monolayer were between chiral domains with the same unit cell orientation. Boundaries between any of the three orientational domains indicated by LEED were not observed together on the same terrace, but monolayers with the three different orientations were observed separately. This follows from Buchner’s hypothesis that chiral domain boundaries, where the molecules are arranged in a “zipper” fashion are more energetically favourable than orientational domain boundaries, and that the activation energy for the rotation of an entire chiral domain to align with its neighbouring domain is less than that required to rotate all the individual molecules in a domain to give them the same chirality.
The molecules are rotated by 15 ▒ 2░ with respect to the close-packed directions of the monolayer. Again, a similar azimuthal rotation has been observed for Co- [194, 196], Fe- and free-base-TPP  on Ag(111), indicating that this rotation arises from interactions between the TPP peripheral groups.
Such a rotation allows the phenyl rings of adjacent molecules to interact in the so-called “T-shape” configuration, where the edge of one phenyl ring is directed toward the π-cloud on the face of its neighbouring phenyl ring . This accounts for a strongly attractive interaction between molecules and plays a major role in their self-assembly, and has been noted to play a key role in both biological and chemical recognition and the interactions between the aromatic side-chains of proteins [220–222].
The molecules’ phenyl rings have an axis of rotation around the single C–C bond joining them to the macrocycle. In order to match the molecular appearance from STM images, two of the phenyl rings were rotated in the opposite direction to the other two. We will refer to this as the “trans” conformation, shown in Figure 5.5a (bottom), distinct from the “cis” conformation where all four phenyl rings are rotated in the same direction, shown in Figure 5.5a (top).
This “counter-rotation” gives rise to some steric hindrance due to the phenyl rings’ proximity to the porphyrin centre. In turn, the macrocycle adopts a saddle conformation, with the outer carbon and hydrogen atoms of the pyrrole rings being pushed into or out of the plane of the molecule.
As an aside, one might na´vely assume that meso-aryl substituted porphyrins in the gas phase would assume a conformation with the phenyl rings rotated by 90░ to the porphyrin macrocycle in order to minimise steric hindrance. However, steric hindrance is only half of the story. Calculated structures comparing H2P (free-base porphine), H2TPP and their diacid analogues have shown that phenyl substituent rotation is frequently accompanied by pyrrole ring saddling in order to increase π-electron coupling between the phenyl rings and the porphyrin macrocycle, reducing the overall potential energy of the molecule .
Since the occupied state STM images of MnClTPP are dominated by the phenyl rings, these features are used to support the saddling hypothesis. It is clear from Figure 5.5b that the brightest (upper) portions of the phenyl rings are not evenly spaced around the periphery of the molecule, as they would be in the “cis” phenyl conformation. Instead, the bright protrusions are arranged at the corners of a rectangle, implying that the upper parts of the phenyl rings are tilted towards one another along the short side of the rectangle. This conformation is supported by DFT, with the saddle-shaped molecule (Figure 5.5a, bottom) having a total energy 5 meV/atom lower than the planar conformation.
As shown in the schematic comparison between the upper STM image in Figure 5.5b and the model below, this trans conformation reproduces the packing of the molecules very well, with the upper-most parts of the phenyl rings highlighted as these are the brightest features on the STM image due to their proximity to the tip.
Such a saddling of the porphyrin molecule is generally accompanied by a difference in the apparent height of the pyrrole rings’ features as observed by STM , however at the sample bias Vsample = -1.4 V, the macrocycle appears to have a mostly uniform height.
Also noted in STM images is some “buckling” in the monolayer. This is illustrated in Figure 5.5c. The purple and green arrows point to two phenyl rings with inequivalent heights within the same molecule.
This buckling of the monolayer can be described by a × R45░ unit cell. This is shown in black in Figure 5.5c, and the two inequivalent “types” of phenyl rings are shown by purple and green circles.
A × R45░ unit cell was also suggested by Beggan and colleagues in order for the molecular overlayer to lie commensurate to the Ag(111) surface, with the corner molecules situated directly above a substrate atom and the central molecule situated on a bridge site between two Ag atoms, however they did not observe buckling in the monolayer .
It is unclear whether this so-called “buckling” is caused by the plane of some molecules deviating from a parallel orientation with the surface, or by one phenyl ring of each molecule being tilted almost perpendicular to the molecular plane, however from previous studies of porphyrin complexes on noble metals [194, 196, 198], and the strength of the interaction between such molecules and the surface, it is suggested that the latter is the case.
The interaction between the π-system of the macrocycle and the substrate has already been mentioned, and its significance is seen in the fact that the molecular unit cell and the axes of the molecules themselves are aligned along close-packed directions of the surface. It is therefore clear that the strength of this interaction is much larger than the energy required to rotate one phenyl ring around a single C–C bond. This likely comes about in order to relieve some strain on the molecular layer and to facilitate a closer edge–face interaction between neighbouring phenyl rings.
Occupied-state STM images of the MnClTPP monolayer obtained at negative sample biases (Figure 5.6a) show the molecules as four bright protrusions, corresponding to the phenyl rings, surrounding the porphyrin core, which appears as a darker ring with a dark centre. This is consistent with previous studies of metallo-porphyrins showing that the occupied molecular orbitals are mostly localised within the phenyl rings [195, 199–201]. Similarly, it has been shown for Co-TBrPP that in the saddle conformation, the Co dz2 orbital did not contribute to the HOMO of the molecule observed by STM , resulting in a dark centre giving further evidence for the proposed MnClTPP saddle conformation.
In contrast, when the unoccupied states of the molecules are probed at positive a sample bias (Figure 5.6b), the molecules show a bright protrusion in the centre corresponding to the Cl-ligand pointing out of the surface (green oval in inset). In the previous study of this system, the Cl-ligand was not resolved, however it is noted here that only under the specific tunneling conditions used in Figure 5.6b was it possible to observe the axial ligand. Measurements were performed at 78 K, and so the thermal stability of the molecules during the current experiments was greater than that of Beggan and co-workers’ room temperature work, also contributing to the ability to image the axial ligand.
This is the first direct indication that the MnClTPP molecules arrive at the Ag(111) surface with the Cl-ligand intact, however Beggan and co-authors have shown that the chemical environment of the Cl atom is consistent with coordination to the central Mn atom, and not reacted with the Ag(111) surface . They therefore propose that the Cl-ligand points out of the surface into the vacuum, and the current results are in agreement with this theory.